![]() By using Process Lasso, you agree to accept all liability, even if it somehow ate your cat. That said, there are no warranties, expressed or implied. Even then, no hardware damage could possibly occur, in my opinion. Therefore, do not reconfigure Process Lasso if you do not understand what you are doing. User created rules can cause software malfunctions if the user does not know what he or she is doing. This mechanism is tried and tested for a decade now. This is the same thing Google Chrome does, for instance. Regarding Process Lasso's ProBalance algorithm: Instead of raising priorities, which is ineffective and can lead to software malfunctions in some cases, it lowers priorities of select background processes. It doesn't mess with software that has adjusted its own priority. It leaves things alone that shouldn't be touched. Unlike certain scams out there, our algorithm takes the conservative approach. As we say on our About page, our #1 rule is: Do No Harm. Further, Process Lasso is designed to be 100% safe and conservative in all its actions. It just isn't feasible, and that's not how things work. Whoever said that was misinformed, or perhaps you misunderstood them. That is just outside the realm of possibility, in my opinion. I can not imagine ANY scenario where it would be possible that hardware damage could occur through priority or affinity adjustments, even if you TRIED To do such. Boy do I feel silly saying that in response to something that is almost like 'Would Process Lasso eat my cat?'. You do use our software at your own risk. Therefore, first, see legal disclaimer and EULA. However, in this lawsuit happy world, I can't make 'absolute' statements, no matter how insane the claim is. ![]() Pat Ryder told DefenseScoop that, at the time, he was not concerned the two agencies’ lack of common language for the term would cause challenges with information- and data-sharing on the topic, which both organizations are prioritizing in their overarching efforts.That is indeed a crazy claim. While NASA is pursuing this comprehensive deep-dive on UAPs for its own science and air safety purposes, officials plan to share learnings with other government entities, including DOD’s new All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office.ĭuring a press briefing on Tuesday - days after the DOD announced its new definition for “UAP,” but before NASA officially changed its description for the acronym - Pentagon Press Secretary Brig. The agency expects to release a full report on the findings from the investigation - and host a public meeting in the late Spring 2023 timeframe - where the UAP Independent Study Team will discuss the results. With sights set on enabling data and other science and technology tools to advance humans’ understanding on a historically sticky topic, that independent cadre of experts will apply their learnings to recommend a roadmap for potential UAP data analysis that NASA can steer down the line. Broadly, NASA is commissioning a team of 16 executives and experts to pinpoint how data captured by government, commercial and other sources can be analyzed to ultimately make sense of bizarre UAP-associated happenings that could threaten national security - and shed light on their origins. That independent study kicked off in October and is expected to unfold over the course of about nine months.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |